wholly intersections
  • My Blog
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Intro to Theology

The "Real" War on Christmas

12/14/2015

0 Comments

 
Christmas Day, 1914 is celebrated every year as a testimony to many things. You will see inspiring posts about it on social media, and you will be moved, as I am every year. Christians like to think that on this day, the Prince of Peace conquered, because on this day, at several points along the Western Front, British and French troops on one side and German troops on the other, stopped shooting at each other, came out of the trenches and shared food, soccer, cigarettes and the "Christmas spirit." And the war was over! No. They went back to killing each other. It almost makes me want to become a Puritan, because in banning the celebration of Christmas (and other holy-days, since no day was really more holy than any other, they reasoned), the Puritans might have avoided this particular hypocrisy. But maybe we should celebrate it. When one's home is the battlefield, a day of fellowship between enemy soldiers is really incredible. When your world is relatively stable and tranquil (like many Americans, as long as they avoid cable-news), an act of violence on Christmas seems the worst of atrocities. So, I'm posting this early; you might forget about it by the 25th...
Picture
Forget about it by the 25th so you can enjoy a nice Christmas with your family, but read on for now. Another Christmas event that Americans like to celebrate is Washington crossing the Delaware on Christmas Day 1776. David Hackett Fischer wrote a great big book about it that is quite acclaimed. Did you remember that it was a Christmas event? There's a great (if inaccurate) painting of it that you might have seen. Below is a partial view from pbs.org.
Why did Washington cross the Delaware on Christmas? It sounds like the beginning of a joke. It is not.
Picture
 In Joseph Buffington's 1936 biography, The Soul of Washington, Buffington praised Washington’s wisdom in making the “Christmas Day” (actually December 26, 1776) attack on Trenton, NJ.  Buffington wrote that Washington devised the attack because he was “filled with the Christmas spirit himself… [and] knowing the German and British love of Christmas and their joy of Christmas cheer… [they] would, of all nights in the year, be off guard (53f).” Perhaps Washington (the schismatic Anglican?) was strangely Puritan about holidays? Not likely. Buffington went to great lengths to establish Washington’s special love of Christmas. He might overplay Washington’s “Christmas spirit” but surely the General was capitalizing on the British and German celebrations. Reportedly, when Washington was informed by General Sullivan that the weather inhibited the army’s weapons from firing, Washington retorted “Tell General Sullivan to use the bayonet. I am resolved to take Trenton."[i] Apparently the British/German forces suffered 'only' 23-26 casualties to the Americans 4 or 5. Still, this is not what most Americans think of as “the Christmas spirit” in either the religious or secular sense. In 1779, publisher John Bell wrote that Washington was “a total stranger to religious prejudices, which have so often excited Christians of one denomination to cut the throats of those of another.”[ii] And yet, when caught up in a political conflict against other Christians it was, “use the bayonet.” I know some of my fellow American-Christians are equally inspired by this event and by the Christmas Day truce of 1914, but I that is too much cognitive dissonance for me. For me, December 25, 1776 remains the “Real” War on Christmas. With this kind of historical example, I can’t be too irate over “Happy Holidays.” Now, forget about this and enjoy the Holidays. I intend to have a joyous celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ (that’s basically what ‘Merry Christmas’ means right?).

References:
Howard Peckham, ed.  The Toll of Independence: Engagements and Battle Casualties of the American Revolution (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1974), 27.
[i] Wright, Kevin. “The Crossing and Battle at Trenton – 1776” An article for Bergen County Historical Society. http://www.bergencountyhistory.org/Pages/crossingatdtrenton.html
[ii] Boller, George Washington and Religion, 118.
0 Comments

Liberation in White and Black

10/28/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
In 1998, I first walked through the doors of The Church of the Advocate (Episcopal), in North Philadelphia and found myself facing a mural that illustrates Exodus 12:29, “The Lord smote the first born of Egypt…(KJV).”  At the time, I was living and working in contexts where I was frequently the only White person present and I considered myself quite comfortable.  When I saw the painting of a fierce Black man in broken shackles driving a dagger towards the throat of a ghastly White face, I felt unsafe.  I did not want to be identified with that White face by anyone who might identify with the Black liberator.  White guilt and fear die hard sometimes.  However, I and the friend who had brought me there were the only ones in the vast space and I was both too enthralled and too proud to jump back in the car and leave.  As I learned more about the way that the other thirteen murals connected biblical narrative with the story of African American history (trans-Atlantic slave trade, the suffering of plantation slavery, the abolition movement, segregation, civil rights, Black Nationalism, urban riots) I became more fascinated, but it was years before I returned and began to understand the historical and political context of the Episcopal Church or Philadelphia with regard to race and art.
Picture
In the meantime, while taking a walk in Valley Forge Park in the Philadelphia suburbs, I happened upon Washington Memorial Chapel (also Episcopal) and entered.  It was initially just as disturbing for me, but in a different way.   The stained glass and carvings of the church told stories populated with far more uniformed White men with muskets and bayonets than biblical figures in robes.  The stories of English Protestantism, colonial North America and the Revolutionary founding of the United States (by George Washington in particular) superseded the stories I expected to find visualized in Christian churches.  This time my trans-national Christian multiculturalism and pacifism were offended by what appeared to me to be militaristic White nationalism in the place of worship. 

Shortly thereafter, the Church of the Advocate came back to mind and I realized that these places were in a sense having a sort of visual conversation, or perhaps an iconomachy (image war) about the meaning of the Christian faith, the Bible, America and freedom or liberation.
1 Comment

    Matt Hunter, Ph.D

    Multidisciplinary religious scholar and practitioner

    Archives

    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    Categories

    All
    American Religion
    Barna
    Biblical Worldview
    Christianity
    C.S. Lewis
    Data
    Dissertation
    Education
    Evangelism
    Interfaith
    Nationalism
    Patriotism
    Race
    Religion
    Religion And Pop Culture
    Religion And Pop-culture
    Religious History
    Science
    Sociology
    Teaching
    Theology
    Unchristian
    Violence
    Visual Culture
    Young Adults

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.