wholly intersections
  • My Blog
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Intro to Theology

What the Hell? Teaching and Theological Process Part One

3/11/2011

0 Comments

 
"Every single thing I prepared to teach them had to be revised or discarded once I presented it to them.  Just what was the essential message of Christianity?"  Vincent Donovan, Christianity Rediscovered (1978)---

“So… do you think I’m going to hell?” (there was a Seinfeld episode about this, )
“It doesn’t matter what I think.  I’m not the judge.  God is.”
“Well… do you think you are going to hell?”
“Of course not!  I’ve accepted Jesus as my…”
“Well… I haven’t.  So, you must think I’m going to hell!”
“Listen.  It’s not about hell.  It’s about finding eternal fulfillment in a personal relationship with Jesus.”
“If you have this personal relationship, then you can at least tell me if Jesus is the kind of guy that would send someone to hell for feeling fulfilled without him!  How personal is this relationship!?”
---
Someday, I will write a book called Simple, Easy, Religionless Christianity Made Understandable.  I’ll write whatever I want, but that will be the title because there seems to be a market for these books.  I own at least two.* Many Christian college students in my classes lump all of life into three piles (Sometimes its just Piles 1 & 3).

Pile 1: Everything I need to believe or do to get into heaven when I die.
Pile 2: Everything obligatory or forbidden that will incur guilt and shame if denied.
Pile 3: Everything else, including the explanations for the things in Piles 1 & 2.
Picture
From Left to Right, that would be: Pile 2, Pile 3 and Pile 1.
Given their theological convictions and the fact that most of them haven't read the Bible much, there is a fair amount of sense here; regardless of my protests.  Thankfully (I guess), something in Pile 2 complicates things.  Evangelistic obligation.  In class, I will put students in trios.  Student 1 must “share the gospel” with Student 2.  Student 2 pretends naivete, listens and asks questions for further clarification.  Student 3 listens and throws “flags” or “bleeps out” Christian jargon that would require explanation for someone with minimal background in Christianity.  They take turns and most of them experience massive frustration.  They realize all of the hard work that Christians have done to pack dense theological content into relatively few words.  They realize that Pile 1 & 2 items with no explanations have no “street value."  We enter a cycle of opposing movements.

Movement 1: Consolidate and Assimilate - They want to know "the essentials."  What constitutes "mere" Christianity, the things all true Christians should agree about?  We talk about this as a class and come up with a list.  Then people add things that not everyone in class agrees on.  We argue down to a basic list.
Movement 2: Proliferate and Differentiate - I begin to ask them to explain these things.  We quickly develop explanations that don't make much sense and about which very few people can agree.  The street utility of some things in Pile 1 becomes fragile. The neccesity of working on Pile 3 becomes apparent, but when things get too complicated... we're back to Movement 1.
Picture
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Matt Hunter, Ph.D

    Multidisciplinary religious scholar and practitioner

    Archives

    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    Categories

    All
    American Religion
    Barna
    Biblical Worldview
    Christianity
    C.S. Lewis
    Data
    Dissertation
    Education
    Evangelism
    Interfaith
    Nationalism
    Patriotism
    Race
    Religion
    Religion And Pop Culture
    Religion And Pop-culture
    Religious History
    Science
    Sociology
    Teaching
    Theology
    Unchristian
    Violence
    Visual Culture
    Young Adults

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.